Skip to content

Private lending

A nine-month bridge, with the bank already waiting on the other side

An illustrative scenario. A settlement date that would not move and receipts that would not arrive in time. Private funding covered the gap, with the exit approved before it drew.

Situation
Settlement date months ahead of the season’s receipts
Structure
Private first mortgage over the home farm freehold
Term
Nine months, written with room against an earlier expected exit
A farm office where a settlement date sits on the calendar months ahead of the season’s receipts.
Situation
Settlement date months ahead of the season’s receipts
Structure
Private first mortgage over the home farm freehold
Term
Nine months, written with room against an earlier expected exit
Exit
Agribusiness refinance, conditionally approved before the bridge drew
Interest
Capitalised into the facility rather than paid monthly
Costs
Valuation, legal and establishment costs quantified before signing
Pricing
Above bank funding, and treated as a bridge rather than a destination

The situation

A family farming operation in western Victoria, third generation, mixed cropping. The neighbouring block came up, which in that district happens roughly once in a working life. They signed on it. Settlement was set for a date the vendor would not move.

The problem was timing and only timing. The business was sound and the equity in the home farm was substantial. But agricultural income arrives in a lump after harvest, and settlement fell several months before the receipts. The agribusiness lender was working on the facility and was not going to be ready in time, because a bank’s credit process runs at the speed a bank’s credit process runs.

The choice on the table

  • Let the contract lapse and lose a block that would not come up again for a generation.
  • Sell something to raise the money, which meant selling productive land to buy productive land.
  • Bridge the months between settlement and the season’s receipts with short-term funding.

What we did

Private lending is the right tool for a small number of situations and the wrong tool for most. It suits a defined gap with a defined end. It does not suit an ongoing shortfall, and using it that way turns an expensive short loan into an expensive long one.

The exit is the deal

Before any lender was approached, the exit was documented. Not described. Documented. The agribusiness lender’s conditional approval for the takeout facility was obtained, and the private facility was structured to sit behind that timetable with room in it.

A private lender is being asked to fund quickly against security, and the question it is really asking is how it gets repaid. Where the answer is an intention rather than a document, the file either does not proceed or proceeds on terms nobody wants. Where the answer is a conditional approval with a date, it becomes an ordinary transaction.

What a borrower should expect from private funding

  • It is priced above bank funding. That is the trade for speed and for flexibility, and it should be treated as the cost of a specific outcome rather than as a rate to be argued down.
  • Terms are short. Months, not years, with the facility written to a defined end point.
  • Interest is often prepaid or capitalised into the facility rather than paid monthly, which affects how much needs to be borrowed in the first place.
  • The borrower carries valuation, legal and establishment costs, and they should be quantified before anything is signed.
  • Security is registered properly. Here, a first mortgage over the home farm freehold.
  • Independent legal advice is normal and, on a facility of this kind, sensible.

A bridge is larger than the gap it covers

The shortfall is the easy part of the sum. Nine months of interest and the cost of doing the deal are borrowed as well, because a facility sized to the gap alone runs dry before the exit arrives and then has to be renegotiated from a weak position. Size it once, honestly, at the start.

Illustrative figures within a composite scenario, on an assumed cost of funds rather than any current or quoted rate. Not a quote and not an offer of credit.

View as a table
ComponentAmountShare
Purchase shortfall$1,200,00088%
Nine months of interest, capitalised$120,0009%
Valuation, legal and establishment costs$40,0003%
Total$1,360,000100%
  1. 01

    Step one — confirm the exit before anything else

    Conditional approval obtained from the agribusiness lender for the takeout facility, with its own timetable understood.

  2. 02

    Step two — size the facility honestly

    Purchase shortfall, capitalised interest, and all costs included, so the borrower is not short two months in and forced to renegotiate.

  3. 03

    Step three — settle the purchase

    Nine-month private first mortgage settles on the contract date. The block is secured.

  4. 04

    Step four — take it out

    Harvest receipts land, the agribusiness facility completes, and the private loan is repaid inside its term.

Where it landed

In this scenario the purchase settles on the contract date, the block is added to the operation, and the private facility is repaid when the mainstream refinance completes. Total cost of the bridge was known and accepted at the outset, and it was weighed against the value of a block that would not come up again.

That is the correct way to judge short-term funding. Not against a bank rate, which was never available on that date, but against the outcome of the alternative. Here the alternative was losing the contract.

  • Exit approved in writing before the bridge was arranged, not hoped for afterwards.
  • Facility sized to include capitalised interest and every cost, so the term was not under pressure from day one.
  • A nine-month term written against an exit expected earlier, leaving room for a bank timetable to slip.
  • Repaid in full within the term, with the operation on ordinary agribusiness terms afterwards.

The honest warning belongs at the end. Where the exit does not eventuate, a bridge has to be extended or refinanced, and both cost money. Anyone considering short-term funding should ask what happens if the exit is late, and should not proceed until that answer is acceptable. If the exit is uncertain, private funding is usually the wrong structure, however quickly it can settle.

Credentials

  • Credit Representative 554029
  • ABN 20 672 801 651
  • FBAA member
  • AFCA external dispute resolution

Your situation is not identical. It rarely is.

Every one of these started with someone telling us the honest number. That is all the first conversation needs to be.

Or call us

1300 015 267

Monday – Friday, 09:00 to 17:30

Dave Pham, Head Broker at WeL'nd

“Tell me the number. I have almost certainly seen worse.”

Dave Pham · Head Broker

Talk to Dave1300 015 267

Sending this form gives us your permission to contact you about your enquiry, by phone or by email. We use your details for that purpose and hold them as set out in our privacy policy. You can ask us to stop at any time. Sending it does not apply for credit and does not commit you to anything.