Payroll tax
Three small sites, one payroll tax bill nobody expected
An illustrative scenario. Grouping provisions treated three modest cafes as one employer, and the arrears arrived with interest attached. A commercial refinance cleared them.
- Situation
- Roughly $180,000 in payroll tax, interest and penalty tax, illustrative
- Cause
- Grouping provisions pushed three related entities over the threshold
- Regulator
- State Revenue Office, not the ATO

- Situation
- Roughly $180,000 in payroll tax, interest and penalty tax, illustrative
- Cause
- Grouping provisions pushed three related entities over the threshold
- Regulator
- State Revenue Office, not the ATO
- Structure
- Refinance of a commercial freehold held in the group’s holding entity
- Presentation
- Three entities consolidated into a single group position for credit
- Settlement
- Arrears paid in full directly at settlement
- Follow-up
- Monthly provisioning established with the bookkeeper
The situation
Three cafes, three separate trading entities, one family behind all of them. Each site on its own was a small employer and, looked at individually, none of them thought about payroll tax at all. That was the mistake, and it is a common one.
Payroll tax is a state tax, administered in Victoria by the State Revenue Office rather than the ATO. It has grouping provisions, and where businesses are related through common ownership or control, they can be treated as a single employer for threshold purposes. Three small wage bills became one wage bill above the threshold, and the liability ran back across prior years with interest and penalty tax on top. In this scenario the assessment landed at roughly $180,000.
What a $180,000 payroll tax assessment is actually made of
- Payroll tax across prior years$130,000
- Interest$32,000
- Penalty tax$18,000
The tax itself is only part of the letter. Interest and penalty tax arrive attached to it, and they keep accruing until the arrears are paid rather than until the question is settled. That is why this gets cleared in one movement instead of chipped at across a few good quarters.
Illustrative figures within a composite scenario. Payroll tax rates, thresholds and grouping rules differ between states and change over time. Not a quote and not an offer of credit.
View as a table
| Component | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Payroll tax across prior years | $130,000 | 72% |
| Interest | $32,000 | 18% |
| Penalty tax | $18,000 | 10% |
| Total | $180,000 | 100% |
Why it hits hospitality particularly hard
- Wages are the dominant cost, so a small percentage of a large wage bill is a serious number against hospitality margins.
- Multiple sites under one family are the normal structure, which is exactly what grouping is designed to capture.
- The liability is often assessed retrospectively, so the bill arrives for years already traded and already spent.
- It is a state liability. An ATO payment plan does nothing about it, and the two are administered separately.
What we did
Nothing was funded until the tax agent had reviewed the assessment. Funding a number that later moves is expensive and avoidable, and in this scenario the review was worth doing on its own merits before a dollar was borrowed.
Once the figure was settled, the finance question was straightforward in shape and awkward in detail. Three trading entities, three sets of accounts, and one liability that sat across all of them. Lenders do not enjoy that arrangement, and the submission has to do the work of making it legible.
Consolidating the story, not just the debt
The group held a commercial freehold, one of the three sites, in a holding entity, with a modest existing facility against it. The structure was a refinance of that freehold, with the borrowing entity taking the liability and the funds paying the arrears in full.
Presenting it took as much work as arranging it. Three sets of financials were consolidated into a single group position so a credit team could read revenue, wages and serviceability across the whole operation rather than piecing together three partial pictures and assuming the worst about the gaps.
- 01
Step one — confirm the liability
Registered tax agent reviews the assessment, the grouping basis and any objection position before finance is arranged.
- 02
Step two — consolidate the numbers
Three entities presented as one group position: combined revenue, combined wages, combined serviceability, related-party flows explained rather than left to inference.
- 03
Step three — select on policy
A lender that reads hospitality and accepts a group structure. Not every commercial lender does either, and finding out at assessment stage wastes weeks.
- 04
Step four — settle and pay directly
The arrears are paid in full at settlement rather than funds being released to the borrower.
- 05
Step five — build the habit
Monthly provisioning set up with the bookkeeper so the current-year liability is put aside as it accrues.
Where it landed
In this scenario the arrears are paid in full, the interest and penalty exposure stops accruing, and the group returns to meeting its current obligations from current trading. The commercial facility is larger than it was, over a term the group can carry against three trading sites.
The more durable outcome was the provisioning. The reason a group of small sites gets caught is that nobody was setting money aside for a liability they did not know applied to them. Once it is a monthly line item, it stops being an event.
- Arrears, interest and penalty tax paid out in one movement.
- One commercial facility over property the group already owned, rather than three separate small-business facilities.
- Group financials now maintained in a consolidated form, which makes every future application faster.
- Current-year payroll tax provisioned monthly rather than discovered annually.
Two limits, plainly. Payroll tax thresholds, rates and grouping rules differ between states and change over time, so a group trading across a border needs advice in each one. And securing the liability against a commercial freehold puts that property behind the debt, which is a real decision for a family that trades from it.
Credentials
- Credit Representative 554029
- ABN 20 672 801 651
- FBAA member
- AFCA external dispute resolution
Services
The services behind this
Payroll Tax Debt
Payroll tax is a state debt, not an ATO one. WeL’nd arranges finance to clear State Revenue Office arrears bef
Read moreBusiness Debt Consolidation
Consolidate business debt into one repayment. ATO balances, unsecured loans, daily-debit lenders and cards, re
Read moreCommercial Property
Finance for owner-occupied and investment commercial property. How LVR, term and rate structure differ from re
Read moreWorking Capital
Overdrafts, lines of credit, invoice finance and trade facilities. How to size a working capital gap properly
Read moreATO Debt Consolidation
Refinance ATO and business tax debt into one loan. Melbourne brokers across a panel of 40+ lenders, working wi
Read moreFranchise Finance
Funding a franchise purchase, fit-out or second site. Accredited systems, why the agreement term drives the lo
Read more
Reading
Understand the mechanism
Cash Flow Finance in Australia: The Options Compared
Overdraft, unsecured loan, invoice finance, trade line, equipment refinance or a secured refinance against property. Six ways to fund a cash flow gap, and how to tell which one your business actually needs.
Read moreBusiness Loan vs Overdraft: Which One Fits
A term loan and an overdraft are not two prices for the same thing. One funds a known amount, the other absorbs a swing, and using the wrong one costs money the rate never shows.
Read moreHow lenders actually view tax debt
Tax debt is not read like ordinary debt, because the ATO can act without going to court. Here is how prime, non-bank and private lenders assess it, and what makes a file fundable.
Read more
Your situation is not identical. It rarely is.
Every one of these started with someone telling us the honest number. That is all the first conversation needs to be.
Or call us
1300 015 267Monday – Friday, 09:00 to 17:30

“Tell me the number. I have almost certainly seen worse.”
Dave Pham · Head Broker